Current:Home > reviewsCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -Secure Growth Solutions
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
View
Date:2025-04-18 20:05:38
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (18)
Related
- Olympic men's basketball bracket: Results of the 5x5 tournament
- Opponents in an Alabama lawsuit over Confederate monument protests reach a tentative settlement
- Climate change made Libya flooding 50 times more likely: Report
- Does the ‘healthiest diet’ exist? Why it's so important to consider things other than food.
- 'Meet me at the gate': Watch as widow scatters husband's ashes, BASE jumps into canyon
- What is 'modern monogamy'? Why it's a fit for some couples.
- Military drone crashes during test flight in Iran, injuring 2
- Which carmaker offers the most dependable luxury SUV? See if your choice is on the list
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Not all types of cholesterol are bad. Here's the one you need to lower.
Ranking
- How breaking emerged from battles in the burning Bronx to the Paris Olympics stage
- Travis Scott questioned in Astroworld festival deposition following wave of lawsuits
- UEFA Champions League live updates: Schedule, time, TV, scores, streaming info for Tuesday
- Why *NSYNC's Bigger Plans for Reunion and New Song Better Place Didn't Happen
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Most Americans view Israel as a partner, but fewer see it as sharing US values, AP-NORC poll shows
- Sponsor an ocean? Tiny island nation of Niue has a novel plan to protect its slice of the Pacific
- Google brings its AI chatbot Bard into its inner circle, opening door to Gmail, Maps, YouTube
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Why large cities will bear the brunt of climate change, according to experts
Ex-Indiana substitute teacher gets 10 months in prison for sending hoax bomb threats to schools, newspaper
Indianapolis officer fatally shoots armed man after responding to domestic violence call
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
‘Stop it!’ UN’s nuclear chief pushes Iran to end block on international inspectors
Why large cities will bear the brunt of climate change, according to experts
Rep. Jennifer Wexton won't seek reelection due to new diagnosis: There is no 'getting better'