Current:Home > reviewsThis Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early -Secure Growth Solutions
This Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early
View
Date:2025-04-14 09:19:45
Don't claim Social Security early for the wrong reasons
Many Americans fear for the future of Social Security, and this could be leading them to make some bad choices.
In fact, one recent study showed 44% of people think Social Security is going to run out of money before their retirement. This is one reason more than four in 10 people indicate they plan to claim Social Security between the ages of 62 and 65. By contrast, just 10% plan to wait until 70.
While it may seem smart to collect benefits ASAP in such a scenario, this is actually the worst possible reason to claim Social Security early. Here's why.
Making decisions related to Social Security because of a fear you won't get any benefits at all is a short-sighted choice that could cost you thousands of dollars. There are a few reasons for that.
Despite popular belief, Social Security is not in danger of running out of money. It has a steady revenue stream that comes from current workers' payroll taxes. This is not going to stop happening unless everyone in the U.S. stops working or unless the funding mechanism is changed -- which is extremely unlikely to occur.
It is true, however, that Social Security's trust fund is in danger of depletion by 2033. But if that happens, there would still be enough money coming from tax revenue to pay about 77% of the benefits promised. That's a hit, but it doesn't mean you won't get any of your retirement funds
Can I collect Social Security yet?It depends on when you were born.
Claiming Social Security early guarantees a smaller monthly check
The reality is, an early Social Security claim is going to mean you definitely get a smaller monthly benefit.
That's because you will get hit with early filing penalties if you claim before FRA. These could shrink your monthly checks by as much as 30% depending on how far ahead of schedule you start payments. And if you wait until FRA but not until age 70, you'll pass up delayed retirement credits that increase your monthly benefit up to 8% for each full year that you delay payments.
You do give up income by waiting to get benefits, but the majority of retirees are better off waiting until 70 because the larger monthly checks from claiming at that age add up to higher lifetime income from Social Security.
So, unless there are clear reasons why you want your benefits early -- such as concerns about your health or a desire to retire early that hinges on Social Security -- you should think very carefully before you make that choice. And definitely don't claim benefits prematurely out of fear of a future without them as that's unlikely to happen.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (129)
Related
- NCAA President Charlie Baker would be 'shocked' if women's tournament revenue units isn't passed
- Israeli Olympians' safety must be top priority after another sick antisemitic display
- Did Katie Ledecky win? How she finished in 1500 free heat, highlights from Paris Olympics
- Did the Olympics mock the Last Supper? Explaining Dionysus and why Christians are angry
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Saoirse Ronan secretly married her 'Mary Queen of Scots' co-star Jack Lowden in Scotland
- Lawsuit says Norfolk Southern’s freight trains cause chronic delays for Amtrak
- The Daily Money: Saying no to parenthood
- USA women's basketball live updates at Olympics: Start time vs Nigeria, how to watch
- More ground cinnamon recalled due to elevated levels of lead, FDA says
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- How Stephen Nedoroscik Became Team USA's Pommel Horse Hero
- Perfect photo of near-perfect surfer goes viral at 2024 Olympics
- Sheriff's deputy accused of texting and driving in crash that killed 80-year-old: Reports
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Utility cuts natural gas service to landslide-stricken Southern California neighborhood
- Israeli Olympians' safety must be top priority after another sick antisemitic display
- 2024 Olympics: Egyptian Fencer Nada Hafez Shares She Competed in Paris Games While 7 Months Pregnant
Recommendation
Carolinas bracing for second landfall from Tropical Storm Debby: Live updates
Steals from Lululemon’s We Made Too Much: $29 Shirts, $59 Sweaters, $69 Leggings & More Unmissable Scores
Best of 'ArtButMakeItSports': Famed Social media account dominates Paris Olympics' first week
Simone Biles, U.S. women's gymnastics dominate team finals to win gold: Social media reacts
A New York Appellate Court Rejects a Broad Application of the State’s Green Amendment
Orioles pay pretty penny for Trevor Rogers in MLB trade deadline deal with Marlins
Man who followed woman into her NYC apartment and stabbed her to death sentenced to 30 years to life
Did Katie Ledecky win? How she finished in 1500 free heat, highlights from Paris Olympics